Close
Metadata

1. Identity statement
Reference TypeConference Paper (Conference Proceedings)
Sitemtc-m21b.sid.inpe.br
Holder Codeisadg {BR SPINPE} ibi 8JMKD3MGPCW/3DT298S
Identifier8JMKD3MGP3W34P/3PP5UN2
Repositorysid.inpe.br/mtc-m21b/2017/10.05.16.39   (restricted access)
Last Update2017:10.05.16.39.42 (UTC) administrator
Metadata Repositorysid.inpe.br/mtc-m21b/2017/10.05.16.39.42
Metadata Last Update2018:06.04.02.27.54 (UTC) administrator
Secondary KeyINPE--PRE/
ISBN1891706411
ISSN23259000
Citation KeyNapoleãoFeliSouzVija:2017:TeSt
TitlePractical similarities and differences between systematic literature reviews and systematic mappings: a tertiary study
Year2017
Access Date2024, July 26
Secondary TypePRE CI
Number of Files1
Size122 KiB
2. Context
Author1 Napoleão, Bianca M.
2 Felizardo, Katia R.
3 Souza, Érica F. de
4 Vijaykumar, Nandamudi Lankalapalli
Resume Identifier1
2
3
4 8JMKD3MGP5W/3C9JHTU
Group1
2
3
4 LABAC-COCTE-INPE-MCTIC-GOV-BR
Affiliation1 Universidade Tecnológica Federal do Paraná (UTFPR)
2 Universidade Tecnológica Federal do Paraná (UTFPR)
3 Universidade Tecnológica Federal do Paraná (UTFPR)
4 Instituto Nacional de Pesquisas Espaciais (INPE)
Author e-Mail Address1 biancanapoleao@alunos.utfpr.edu.br
2 katiascannavino@utfpr.edu.br
3 ericasouza@utfpr.edu.br
4 vijay.nl@inpe.br
Conference NameInternational Conference on Software Engineering and Knowledge Engineering, 29 (SEKE)
Conference LocationPittsburgh
Date5-7 July
Pages85-90
Book TitleProceedings
History (UTC)2017-10-05 16:40:08 :: simone -> administrator :: 2017
2018-06-04 02:27:54 :: administrator -> simone :: 2017
3. Content and structure
Is the master or a copy?is the master
Content Stagecompleted
Transferable1
Content TypeExternal Contribution
Version Typepublisher
KeywordsSystematic Literature Review
Systematic Mapping
Secondary Studies
AbstractSeveral researchers have reported their experiences in applying secondary studies in Software Engineering (SE), however, there is a lack of studies discussing the distinction between Systematic Mappings (SMs) and Systematic Literature Reviews (SLRs). Aims: The objective of this paper is to present the results of a tertiary study conducted to collect and evaluate evidence to better understand similarities and differences between SLRs and SMs related to four aspects: Research question, search string, search strategy and quality assessment. Method: We identified 170 secondary studies that were reviewed to answer a set of Research Questions (RQ) related to the practical conduction of secondary studies in SE. Results: Results show that both SLRs and SMs have generic RQs, broad search strings, and adopt automatic search as search strategy. However, quality assessment has been more widely adopted in SLRs. Conclusions: In practice, only the quality assessment is conducted differently in SLRs and SMs.
AreaCOMP
Arrangementurlib.net > BDMCI > Fonds > Produção anterior à 2021 > LABAC > Practical similarities and...
doc Directory Contentaccess
source Directory Contentthere are no files
agreement Directory Content
agreement.html 05/10/2017 13:39 1.0 KiB 
4. Conditions of access and use
Languageen
Target Filenapoleao_practical.pdf
User Groupsimone
Reader Groupadministrator
simone
Visibilityshown
Read Permissiondeny from all and allow from 150.163
Update Permissionnot transferred
5. Allied materials
Next Higher Units8JMKD3MGPCW/3ESGTTP
Citing Item Listsid.inpe.br/mtc-m21/2012/07.13.14.56.50 2
Host Collectionsid.inpe.br/mtc-m21b/2013/09.26.14.25.20
6. Notes
Empty Fieldsarchivingpolicy archivist callnumber copyholder copyright creatorhistory descriptionlevel dissemination doi e-mailaddress edition editor format label lineage mark mirrorrepository nextedition notes numberofvolumes orcid organization parameterlist parentrepositories previousedition previouslowerunit progress project publisher publisheraddress rightsholder schedulinginformation secondarydate secondarymark serieseditor session shorttitle sponsor subject tertiarymark tertiarytype type url volume
7. Description control
e-Mail (login)simone
update 


Close